New Research Demolishes Evolution

Posted By : pleomax | Date : 10 Aug 2007 17:59:00 | Comments : 13 |

New Research Demolishes Evolution
Published by:IMedia | ISBN 7151852980 | PDF | 2.8 MB | 66 Pages

Some of the people who have heard of "the theory of evolution", may think that these concepts only concern the field of biology and that they have no significance in their everyday lives. This is a big misconception because far more than a biological concept, the theory of evolution constitutes the underpinnings of a dishonest philosophy that has held sway over a great number of people. That philosophy is "materialism", which holds a number of bogus views about why and how we came into being. Materialism maintains that there is nothing but the matter and that matter is the essence of everything, be it organic or inorganic. Starting out from this premise, it denies the existence of a divine Creator, that is, The Almighty Creator. Reducing everything to the level of matter, this notion transforms man into a creature that heeds only matter and turns away from moral values of whatever kind. This is the beginning of big disasters that will befall a man's life.

“

The Following Questions are also answered:

”

1. WHY IS THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION NOT SCIENTIFICALLY VALID?

2. HOW DOES THE COLLAPSE OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION DEMONSTRATE THE TRUTH OF CREATION?

3. HOW FAR BACK DO TRACES OF MAN GO? WHY DO THESE NOT SUPPORT EVOLUTION?

4. WHY IS THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION "NOT THE BASIS OF BIOLOGY"?

5. WHY IS THE EXISTENCE OF DIFFERENT RACES NOT EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION?

6. WHY IS THE CLAIM THAT HUMAN AND APE GENOMES ARE 99 PERCENT SIMILAR AND THAT THIS CONFIRMS EVOLUTION NOT TRUE?

7. WHY IS THE CLAIM THAT DINOSAURS EVOLVED INTO BIRDS AN UNSCIENTIFIC MYTH?

8. WHAT SCIENTIFIC FORGERY IS THE MYTH THAT "HUMAN EMBRYOS HAVE GILLS" BASED ON?

9. WHY IS IT DECEPTIVE TO PORTRAY CLONING AS "EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION"?

10. COULD LIFE HAVE COME FROM OUTER SPACE?

11. WHY DOES THE FACT THAT THE EARTH IS FOUR BILLION YEARS OLD NOT SUPPORT THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION?

12. WHY ARE WISDOM TEETH NOT EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION?

13. HOW DO THE COMPLEX STRUCTURES OF THE MOST ANCIENT CREATURES DEMOLISH THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION?

14. WHY IS DENYING THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION PORTRAYED AS REJECTING DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESS?

15. WHY IS IT MISTAKEN TO THINK THAT GOD COULD HAVE CREATED LIVING THINGS BY EVOLUTION?

16. WHY IS IT WRONG TO THINK THAT EVOLUTION COULD BE CONFIRMED IN THE FUTURE?

17. WHY IS METAMORPHOSIS NOT EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION?

18. WHY IS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO ACCOUNT FOR DNA BY "CHANCE"?

19. WHY IS IT THAT BACTERIAL RESISTANCE TO ANTIBIOTICS IS NOT AN EXAMPLE OF EVOLUTION?

20. WHAT KIND OF RELATIONSHIP IS THERE BETWEEN CREATION AND SCIENCE?

DOWNLOAD

AFTER READING THIS BOOK WITH AN OPEN MIND, FEEL FREE TO READ ANY BOOKS ON EVOLUTION YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE RIGHT THROUGH THEIR LIES & DECEPTIONS.

ADVERTISING »

High Speed Download

« ADVERTISING

Posted By: technoshaman Date: 10 Aug 2007 18:32:00

BAH!!! Someone needs some schoolin' on the true scientific method.

Posted By: Dr_Faustus Date: 10 Aug 2007 19:09:35

How to respect the beliefs of the ignoramuses that sustain such stupidities?

Posted By: faustoc4 Date: 10 Aug 2007 19:39:13

I am trapped in matters cage
I am locked in heavy chains
Sophia, please rescue me, from the carnal darkness in the shades of reflections

Posted By: Foub Date: 10 Aug 2007 20:14:40

Yet more creationist crap refuted. This pleomax's ignorance is just plain criminal. How can someone so ignorant also use a computer? I know, he gets someone else to post his lies for him. We refute him over and over and over again, yet he keeps posting his lies and distortions hoping that some gullible fool will buy into them. I know this "mindset". One just has to read the link that I have posted to see how each and every one of the above claims against evolution is in error. The idiot doesn't even know what he is arguing against. Most of his assertions aren't even about evolution at all. We're NEVER going to let you get away with your lies.

http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html

These "books" and "films" are actually the best evidence against creationism since they demonstrate such a major lack of understanding of the scientific method, and science in general. One would have to be massively inbred to actually take any of them seriously as books about ANY kind of truth at all. They are no different than books about bigfoot, UFOs, and Elvis sightings.

BTW, who says that cloning is evidence of evolution? This is the first time that I've ever heard of any such claim.

Have any of you noticed that all of his so-called "evidence" is all presented by the same person? A person who has already been discredited and a fraud and a criminal.

Posted By: stfine Date: 10 Aug 2007 23:19:16

IMHO, people like Harun Yahya do very equivocal business, with rare persistance that is worthy of better application.

"You will not find, as in some other books, the personal views of the author, explanations based on dubious sources, styles that are unobservant of the respect and reverence due to sacred subjects, nor hopeless, doubt-creating, and pessimistic accounts that create deviations in the heart." [from the author's web-site]

Sure, if to take Korah as only non-dubious source, "some other books" just don't matter. Once with such mindset Library of Alexandria was barbarically destroyed: "...if what is written in them agrees with the Koran, they are not required; if it disagrees, they are not desired."

Let me draw my own line. I think, it natural for any man to discuss and argue on disturbing topics; this even seems to me the main driving force behind philosophy and science. Surely, if one takes some things so damn hopelessly an pessimistically that intellectual blindnesses is the only escape for him, it's no good for that person. But if one also tries to convert as many people he can, plays on their feelings, makes a mess of common ideas, and do this all with confident guru attitude, it's no good for the society.

The business of sharing such books is also equivocal, but anyway, thanks, you gave us the possibility to develop our thoughts here. ;)

Posted By: LQ Date: 11 Aug 2007 00:13:01

I've gotten to the point where I refuse to even listen to anti-evolution arguments unless the come from an avowed atheist. It's the only way to filter out the self-serving religious nuts.

Posted By: criscros Date: 11 Aug 2007 06:38:49

You're not the typical anti-evolutionist who's capable of thinking along the
lines of science, you're a conspiracy theorist ("they" lie to us! "they" deceive
us!) plus you think that you belong to a tiny minority of enlightened people.

"AFTER READING THIS BOOK WITH AN OPEN MIND...
...SEE RIGHT THROUGH THEIR LIES & DECEPTIONS."

Oh boy, YOU seem just the right person to tell other people to open their minds.

Well, thanks for the upload anyway. :D

Posted By: pleomax Date: 11 Aug 2007 07:17:48

Well Foub i read a few topics from http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html which didn't have any proof and most of them was so confusing that any sane person would have to go to Psychiatrist after reading your fake claims.

If you EVOLUTIONIST are so truthful , then why do you keep commenting/attacking as if you are a pack of wolf infected by Rabies.

You post your own proofs and let the people decide who is truthful.

Posted By: inuit Date: 11 Aug 2007 07:21:38

Posted By: jhbbunch Date: 11 Aug 2007 08:09:10

You're a liar pleomax. Most of the hackneyed, hoary old stories that make up this book are
disproven and easily so at that site. But i'll just cut through the BS and make my usual point.
Show me the fossil bed that contains modern animals and ancient ones as creationist 'theory'
would predict. Just one bed. And if you bring up the retard Paluxy tracks and tin cup and
hammers in a coal mine then you are a bigger idiot than I already think you are. So far, you
are the equivalent of the UFO morons who show us photos of pie plates on a string.

Posted By: Foub Date: 11 Aug 2007 11:43:39

"Well Foub i read a few topics from http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html which didn't have any proof and most of them was so confusing that any sane person would have to go to Psychiatrist after reading your fake claims."

[rolls eyes] What a retard you have oh so proven yourself to be. There is a little thing called references at the end of each refutation.

"If you EVOLUTIONIST are so truthful , then why do you keep commenting/attacking as if you are a pack of wolf infected by Rabies."

Why do people go after Holocaust deniers? BTW, that is what your "source" is as well. You are spreading lies and distortions, and you have been more than refuted on every account.

It is important to have an open mind, but not so open that one's brains fall out, like what has happened to you. You are nothing more than a nutjob. There is no conspiracy to speak of about evolution.

"You post your own proofs and let the people decide who is truthful."

I've got news for you. It is only you creationists who have any real trouble understanding what evolution is. The jury has been in for a long time on it and the verdict is that evolution is true. But then again you have more than shown that you in fact don't even know what evolution is and isn't.

Posted By: Foub Date: 11 Aug 2007 11:48:36

"You're a liar pleomax. Most of the hackneyed, hoary old stories that make up this book are
disproven and easily so at that site. But i'll just cut through the BS and make my usual point.
Show me the fossil bed that contains modern animals and ancient ones as creationist 'theory'
would predict. Just one bed. And if you bring up the retard Paluxy tracks and tin cup and
hammers in a coal mine then you are a bigger idiot than I already think you are. So far, you
are the equivalent of the UFO morons who show us photos of pie plates on a string."

pleomax is such a retard that he is even using arguments that OTHER creationists don't use anymore because they have been so throughly refuted that to continue to use them will only further prove just how much of an ignorant fool he actually is. He has a martyr complex as well. He is also clueless on what has been happening in the creationist community lately as well.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/faq/dont_use.asp

Posted By: Zeratul Date: 18 Aug 2007 19:56:28

Harun Yahya is not a scientist, no scientist would debase himself by using a pseudonym (all readers, please check wikipedia for this "scientist"). And just let me quote from Shakepeare :

That which we call "creationism",
By any other name ("intelligent design" or whatever) would smell as shit.

This book has been translated into other languages and can be downloaded for free. And the printed version has been distributed widely. Thus this book is a propaganda material.

Recent searches: