Loading...
Done

Why Animals Don't Get Heart Attacks but People Do

Posted By : outcaast | Date : 05 Aug 2007 12:52:00 | Comments : 13 |
|



Matthias Rath, «Why Animals Don't Get Heart Attacks but People Do»
MR Publishing | ISBN: 0967954681 | 4th edition (August 2003) | 320 pages | PDF | 9 Mb

In Why Animals Don't Get Heart Attacks, But People Do, Matthias Rath, M.D., an internationally respected cardiovascular researcher, asserts that high cholesterol is not the actual cause of heart disease. Bears, for example, have average cholesterol levels of 400 milligrams per deciliter of blood, but they don't suffer heart attacks. Why? According to Dr. Rath, it is because bears produce large amounts of vitamin C, which optimizes collagen production and ensures maximum stability of their artery walls.
Dr. Rath's research identifies the true cause of heart disease as a deficiency of vitamin C and other essential nutrients in the cells composing the heart and coronary arteries - not high cholesterol. Once the artery wall is weakened by vitamin deficiency, the body responds by producing excess cholesterol in the liver and depositing it in the injured artery. If this process continues without nutritional intervention, the buildup of fats in the arteries will eventually lead to atherosclerosis, the cause of heart attacks.
Using easy-to-understand language, Dr. Rath explains what the reader can do to prevent heart attacks and other cardiovascular conditions naturally. He presents his ten-step program for achieving natural cardiovascular health, as well as his clinically proven Cellular Health nutrient recommendations for preventing and improving heart disease, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, heart failure, arrhythmia, diabetes and other conditions. Dr. Rath even provides clinical proof - complete with the Ultrafast CT scans of patient's arteries - of the natural reversal of atherosclerotic deposits, without angioplasty or bypass surgery.
This revised edition of Why Animals Don't Get Heart Attacks, But People Do! has been updated with new research findings that corroborate Dr. Rath's vitamin C deficiency-heart disease discovery, his cardiovascular presentation at Stanford Medical School, and information about the recent efforts of the pharmaceutical industry to suppress his medical breakthrough. Dr. Rath also exposes the pharmaceutical industry's profit motives for pushing statin drugs, which do not target the true cause of heart disease and have dangerous side effects.
Why Animals Don't Get Heart Attacks, But People Do! is the blueprint for a new health care system based on the needs of patients, not profits from statin drug sales. The information contained on its pages will empower readers to take control of their cardiovascular health and end their dependency on pharmaceutical drugs.
About the Author
Matthias Rath, M.D. is an internationally respected cardiovascular researcher who worked closely with the late two-time Nobel Laureate Linus Pauling, Ph.D. Dr. Rath was appointed by Pauling as the first director of cardiovascular research at the Linus Pauling Institute, formerly located in California.
The author of four bestselling health books, Dr. Rath developed the scientific concept of Cellular Medicine, which defines the deficiency of nutrients at the cellular level as a root cause of chronic diseases. His research has been published in numerous scientific journals, including the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine and the Journal of Applied Nutrition
Thanks to kdsaggi!




DOWNLOAD FROM RAPIDSHARE:

HERE


NO MIRRORS PLEASE...


ADVERTISING » High Speed Download « ADVERTISING




Posted By: shwan Date: 05 Aug 2007 16:27:20
Thank you
very good Book
Posted By: dumpster Date: 05 Aug 2007 18:01:46
This is not a very good book. Matthias Rath has just killed a 9-year-old boy by proposing to his parents that his "therapy" of giving high doses of vitamins will cure cancer. Then he pushed him into the spotlight of media and stated he has been cured, trying to sell his overdosed and overprised vitamin-cocktails. The boy died half a year later. The death was caused by metastases in his lungs and brain. He could have been saved by a conventional chemotherapy, but the parents, under the influence of Rath, refused various offerings. After the death of the kid, Rath told the media there has been a conspiracy to delegitimise his "effective method". After several documentaries in german TV, confronting Rath with his lies, he left germany and settled in southern africa. Now he is proposing to AIDS-Patients over there that he is able to cure them by (surprise!) giving them high doses of vitamins. This sick fuck is playing with peoples lives and hopes to get rich, so please do not promote him any further.
Posted By: meganathanj Date: 05 Aug 2007 18:05:12
Many many thanks outcaast.
Posted By: meganathanj Date: 05 Aug 2007 18:07:13
Thanks a lot dumpster.
Posted By: el_espaniol Date: 05 Aug 2007 19:38:25
http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/thebigpicture.php
http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/
http://www.experimentomortal-maricarmengisbert.com/doctormatthiasrath.htm

Hey Dumpster : 2-two things

" ...He could have been saved by a conventional chemotherapy..."
"...This sick fuck is playing with peoples lives..."

I think You have lose the whole picture : US military and pharmaceutical industries are the major contributors to the US buildup... not the 2-oxo-L-threo-hexono-1,4- lactone-2,3-enediol ...VitaminC , lol...
A cheap therapy for mortal diseases...? ...May be true or not ...I don't know...;...You know...?
Posted By: dumpster Date: 05 Aug 2007 21:55:15
Yeah, i get your point. Nobody knows already the complete role vitamins play in the human body. Maybe they are a cheap therapy for mortal deseases, maybe they are of no use. But thats not really important. Mr. Rath had several possibilities to give proof that he is right with his claims. He refused to do so. Instead he talked the parents of this little child out of conventional therapy, which is effective against cancer without the shadow of a doubt. After the kid had died, what did he do? He has not made apologies for using a child as his personal guinea pig. He has not been seen stating that there could be a chance that is therapy is not effective. Instead, he stated that there has been a conspiracy to discredit him and his theory and he tried to prevent critcal media reports by using the court (which failed).

I concede that there is in fact the possibility that vitamins could play a role in cancer therapy. But CANCER AND AIDS? Come on man. And where is the hard evidence? Does saying "the chemo-industrial complex in the US (and elsewhere) is fooling the people to get more profit" free you from having to substantiate your claims? I do not think so. The Pharma-Multis are badass, no question. But at least they are not testing their products on desperate human beings before they have been tested on rats.

The only person known to me that had undergone a therapy designed by Rath is dead by now, and if nobody stops him, there will be more following.
Posted By: anakputri Date: 06 Aug 2007 03:15:50
Thanks dumpster for the caution. Much appreciated.
Posted By: sam_snead Date: 06 Aug 2007 08:01:14
Dumpster's comments about Rath killing a boy are wrong. The story he's referring to was published in 2004 and since that time the British Medical Journal ended up paying Rath £100000 in damages because that story FALSELY claimed Rath was responsible for the death of a 9-year old german boy.

With this being a sensitive subject and a life or death decision of YOUR life. You need to do your own research and pick the best path for you to take. 8=)

Here is the link that confirms the false claim: http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=vn20070612013943475C787622.
Posted By: LeFunk Date: 06 Aug 2007 09:08:39
DUmpster - thanks for the warning!
Posted By: Sreten_Lukic Date: 06 Aug 2007 13:25:16
Thanks dumpster for the caution. Much appreciated.
Posted By: dumpster Date: 06 Aug 2007 14:21:31
Seems there are many supporters of Mr. Raths World View around here. Or is this just one person changing his ID? My comment on the death of a young boy is NOT false. I do not know why the BMJ lost this case, perhaps because they did not do their homework properly. But in Germany (where the boy was from), the media outlets have won their cases against Rath. And if you do not believe me, here is a site in german (SWR is the south west german television - a state owned TV-Program absolutely free of influence from anyone) critical to Rath:
http://www.swr.de/leben-was-sonst/fall-dominik/-/id=1060178/mpdid=1053446/nid=1060178/did=1053446/4e2f7h/index.html
He has tried several times to mute this station and the documentary they made on the "Case Dominik", and has lost all cases. Oh, and here is a list of other cases that Rath has lost:
http://www.tac.org.za/rathwrongs.html
But again: This does not really matter to me. I asked for facts, for hard evidence that any of the products Rath sells are doing any good. Where are his studies, where are the survivors of cancer or Aids? Oh and I forgot: He is not only claiming to cure AIDS and Cancer with his vitamins, they seem to be working too on Cardiac Disorders, Arteriosklerosis, etc, etc... Needless to say he has not come over with any studies in those cases either.
And dont get me wrong: I am NOT a fan of the pharma-lobby. And there have been a lot of natural cures taken into question before, who proofed to be effective (for example accupunctur and accupressure or various plants from the rainforests of south america). But there is absolutely NO proof coming from Rath. So for me, he plays in one league with people claiming that praying enough to god will cure you from cancer or raping a virgin will free you from having AIDS (another south african "theory" that did not work out very well to say the least).
Posted By: drbobade Date: 20 Dec 2010 04:00:18
Hard evidence is every person with malignancy dies.After Modern therapy. We should have open mind. Wearing Eye glasses of Mr. Einstein wont make you relatively Brilliant. Moral of story is every one has different needs. Thanks all has DIFFERENT GGGGGGGGGGENS.
Posted By: gp7423 Date: 01 Jan 2011 04:13:54
Although there is much to investigate and research to do, you may want to know that Linus Pauling, double Nobel Prize winner is also an advocate of Vitamin C to prevent serious diseases:

"The relationship between vitamin C and health has been controversial for decades. Influential scientists, including double Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling, have argued that ascorbate could prevent or cure serious diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, cancer and infections."

You may also want to check this other book that also treats the subject of Vitamin C

http://avaxhome.ws/ebooks/science_books/medicine/1411607244.html
Recent searches: