Loading...
Done
Home > Music

The Freddie MERCURY Album

Posted By : galmuchet | Date : 10 Jan 2006 15:44:07 | Comments : 8 |
|



The Freddie MERCURY Album

1992 Compilation/EMI Records Ltd RIP+UP (mp3@320) by Galmuchet + Covers & CD


01 The Great Pretender (3:28)
02 Foolin' Around (3:36)
Remix - Steve Brown
03 Time (3:50)
Remix - Nile Rodgers
04 Your Kind Of Lover (3:59)
Remix - Steve Brown
05 Exercises In Free Love (3:58)
06 In My Defence (3:52)
Remix - Ron Nevison
07 Mr. Bad Guy (3:56)
08 Let's Turn It On (3:46)
09 Living On My Own (3:39)
10 Love Kills (4:29)
11 Barcelona (5:37)
Vocals - Montserrat Caballé

50.7 Mb
http://rapidshare.de/files/10763957/la_compile_a_fredo.rar.html
Pass : galmuchet_for_french-te@m

ADVERTISING » High Speed Download « ADVERTISING




Posted By: Perpetum Date: 10 Jan 2006 16:57:55
@galmuchet
THX for sharing. BUT unfortunatelly the real bitrate ist 160 kbps and NOT as stated 320 kbps. Accordingly, the songs sond exacly as is to expected when ripped with 160 kbps (quite shitty).

When I remember right most of the given bitrates in your posts are by far too high.

I suggest to use a good tool indicating the true bitrate of a track, e.g. mp3ext. It's freeware. You can download it from the following web site:

_http://www.mutschler.de/mp3ext/
Posted By: galmuchet Date: 10 Jan 2006 17:27:40
I use Ashampoo MP3 AudioCenter to RIP which give me the bitrate at the end .
I think I will return to Acoustica if there's pb...
Posted By: bvazquezg Date: 11 Jan 2006 05:50:54
galmuchet. I would like to thank you for your greats sharing. I don't care about the bitrate. I only see your effort and goodwill in your posts. Thanks again
Posted By: mpopa Date: 11 Jan 2006 06:14:07
thx
Posted By: mike46 Date: 11 Jan 2006 07:39:09
yes thanx for posting...

however I've found that most people these
days find that a 192 bitrate is more than acceptable.
Posted By: Crobar Date: 11 Jan 2006 08:15:01
Salut Galmuchet
Merci pour le partage ( et les autres).
Je ne sais pas trop à quelle sorte de mutants des oreilles nous avons affaire qui parviennent à capter des différences au dessus de 160 kbps ?!?
La solution à ces gérémiades sans fin au sujet du bit rate serait peut-être de ne fournir que les wav et de les laisser ripper comme bon leur semble.
Je te confirme que mon lecteur annonce aussi des valeurs autour de 160 et que la qualité est bonne pour mon système auditif dégénéré (les effets du grand âge probablement !)
Merci encore
Crobar
Posted By: galmuchet Date: 11 Jan 2006 08:50:05
to Perpetum
J'ai installé mp3ext qui confirme la non fiabilité de MP3audiocenter...et je suis (re)passé a Acoustica désormais
Posted By: dane1 Date: 13 Jan 2006 09:12:54
if U want the best quality.. Use Exact Audio Copy and Razor LAME with the GUI addon

more info at these sites:
http://jthz.com/mp3/

http://users.pandora.be/satcp/eac03p.htm
Recent searches: