Loading...
Done
Home > Music

Genesis - Duke (1980) [2007 SACD 24/96 Stereo Analogue Rip]

Posted By : LezDawson | Date : 26 Mar 2010 01:15:06 | Comments : 9 |
|



Genesis - Duke (1980) [2007 SACD 24/96 Stereo Analogue Rip]
FLAC | No LOG (SACD) | CUE | Scans/Lyrics | 54:59 | 1.18 GB | RS
Progressive Rock

With Duke, their second album as a trio, Genesis continue to rack up commercial success in inverse proportion to the creative losses they suffered with the successive departures of lead singer Peter Gabriel and guitarist Steve Hackett.
Compared to the conceptual musical pretensions of A Curious Feeling and Smallcreep's Day, the previous year's surprisingly limp solo outings by keyboardist Tony Banks and bassist Mike Rutherford, Duke serves as a testament to strength, even in reduced numbers. As art rock goes, Turn It On Again is vibrant rock & roll with keyboards, rhythm section and vocalist deliberately working at rhythmic cross-purposes. Such typical examples of the group's epic classicism as Duchess, Man of Our Times, Duke's Travels and Duke's End possess a refreshing urgency marked by singer-drummer Collins' confident snap and the cool orchestral breeze of Banks' ivory armory.


1. Behind the Lines
2. Duchess
3. Guide Vocal
4. Man of Our Times
5. Misunderstanding
6. Heathaze
7. Turn it on Again
8. Alone Tonight
9. Cul-De-Sac
10. Please Don't Ask
11. Duke's Travels
12. Duke's End



Duke is very, VERY compressed. The intro to the brilliant Behind The Lines is so brick-wall compressed that the sound actually breaks up, distorts and even suffers drop-outs on the higher frequencies (e.g. cymbal crashes) as the volume maxes out beyond what the digital limits can record.

Remix engineer Nick Davis denies any use of excessive compression, and has stated that he is hurt by the criticisms.

Behind The Lines (brick-wall compression)

But the visual displays of the files show otherwise: lots of dynamic clipping, just like the audiophile fans claimed they could hear. However, listening to the new vinyl masters of the Gabriel-fronted albums, shows that excessive compression is used far less on those vinyl versions. So the clipping prevalent on the new CD/SACD releases is certainly a result of the awful CD/SACD mastering by Tony Cousins.

The only real advantage over the DE Remaster edition is the improved clarity of vocals - Guide Vocal really reveals Collins as a deeply soulful substitute for the departed Gabriel. Collins has never sounded so beautifully fragile than on this new mix. Vocals are also brought out a little more - to good effect - on Man Of Our Times. All things considered though, for me the DER is still superior for its dynamic quality.

I hasten to add: the stereo SACD layer is still nicer than the 16-bit CD layer due to the improved resolution. Which is best? The SACD or the DER issue? Judge for yourself! :)
LezDawson

Ripping Gear And Software

NAD T585 SACD/DVDA Audio Player
QED Reference Audio 1 RCA Phono Interconnect Cable
M-Audio Delta66 24/96 Soundcard + breakout box
Cubase 4 (no editing or exporting done - the FLAC is encoded from the original raw WAV)
EAC (used to make CUE file from CD layer)
FLACFrontend
MP3Tag



ADVERTISING » High Speed Download « ADVERTISING




Posted By: drasglaf Date: 26 Mar 2010 05:23:28
Well, this Tony Cousins must be ''thick as brick'' ;)
Thanks a lot!
Posted By: amitnewyork Date: 26 Mar 2010 06:45:45
Appreciate your good efforts, but honestly, these SACD analog rips don't sound much impressive.
Posted By: namrats417 Date: 26 Mar 2010 07:12:19
Thanks for your honesty about the sound - I recently grabbed what was supposed to be a vinyl rip of the original pressing but the cymbals opening Behind The Lines were so annoying it was un-listenable.
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 26 Mar 2010 10:50:11
@ amitnewyork: It's not 'these analogue rips' that don't sound impressive - it's the original SACDs that have been mastered crap. Choose your words better.

Anyway, I shall be posting Abacab SACD next. And a special treat: Atlantic 24K Gold Original Master Abacab 1993 Ted Jensen/Sterling Sound remaster! That should make for an interesting comparison.
Posted By: amitnewyork Date: 26 Mar 2010 18:46:01
Thanks for the "instructions", boss. That's exactly what I meant. You're so sensitive it hurts.
Posted By: AgnusDei Date: 27 Mar 2010 07:15:09
LezDawson delivers again, as promised in the previous upload :)Thanks mate. Nice pics btw ;)
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 27 Mar 2010 08:15:25
@ amitnewyork: Hahaha! I'M the sensitive one?!! :D

@ AgnusDei: You're welcome! :)
Posted By: JoJoPurdie Date: 02 Apr 2011 21:32:29
Any Chance for a reup ? Thanks in advance, would love to hear this one.
Posted By: Rob- Date: 04 Jun 2011 09:09:08
Yup, dead links - please fix. Thanks, Rob
Recent searches: