Loading...
Done
Home > Music

Genesis - Wind And Wuthering (1976) [SACD 24/96 Stereo Analogue Rip]

Posted By : LezDawson | Date : 17 Mar 2010 08:15:00 | Comments : 22 |
|



Genesis - Wind And Wuthering (1976) [SACD 24/96 Stereo Analogue Rip]
FLAC | No LOG (SACD) | CUE | Scans/Lyrics | 50:50 | 1.06 GB | RS
Progressive Rock

Progressive Genesis bites back, with songs like Eleventh Earl of Mar (complete with a storyline based on a Middle Ages figure) and Unquiet Slumbers for the Sleepers... In that Quiet Earth (often split into two parts.) The former sums up the album rather nicely, one part energetic prog onslaught of various keyboards, one part quiet, intimate soft-pop. And though his voice isn't as lively or versatile as Gabriel's, Collins does a good job. The latter is one of Genesis' best instrumentals, and where all the band members join together. Hackett and Collins specifically stand out, Hackett leading the song with a spacey guitar melody, who keeps relatively quiet on the album, besides some acoustic guitar playing, and manic drumming from Collins. Genesis' [largely ripped off by 80s and 90s prog bands] brand of elegant, sweeping progressive rock still maintains a large presence in the music on Wind and Wuthering.

1. Eleventh Earl of Mar
2. One for the Vine
3. Your Own Special Way
4. Wot Gorilla?
5. All in a Mouse's Night
6. Blood on the Rooftops
7. Unquiet Slumbers for the Sleepers...
8. ...In That Quiet Earth
9. Afterglow



In all honesty, I am not a fan of the 2007 remix/remasters for CD/SACD. The volume is maxed out, the compressor/limiter is working overtime, and the peaks are clipped as hell. The tracks have also been EQ'd very bright.
There has been much heated discussion about these masters on the official Genesis forum - with the audiophiles on the one side complaining of the brightness and compression and the loss of Genesis' musical dynamics to the "Loudness Wars," and on the other side devoted fans who simply love the new masters and can't hear what all the fuss is about.

Remix engineer Nick Davis also denies any use of excessive compression, and has stated that he is hurt by the criticisms.


But the visual displays of the files show otherwise: lots of dynamic clipping, just like the audiophile fans claimed they could hear. However, listening to the new vinyl masters of the Gabriel-fronted albums, shows that excessive compression is largely absent on those vinyl versions. So the clipping prevalent on the new CD/SACD releases is certainly a result of the awful CD/SACD mastering by Tony Cousins.

I hasten to add: the stereo SACD layer is still nicer than the 16-bit CD layer due to the improved resolution. Judge for yourself! :)
LezDawson

Ripping Equipment

NAD T585 SACD/DVDA Audio Player
QED Reference Audio 1 RCA Phono Interconnect Cable
M-Audio Delta66 24/96 Soundcard + breakout box
Cubase 4



ADVERTISING » High Speed Download « ADVERTISING




Posted By: wersollsschonsein Date: 17 Mar 2010 08:42:23
Cheers from Eire.
Posted By: Dr. Robert Date: 17 Mar 2010 10:41:35
I was hoping you would start posting some SACD rips now that you have your new player. Thanks for sharing.
Posted By: mistermuse Date: 17 Mar 2010 16:54:04
Actually, if you listen to the vinyl remasters , thank you aksman, side by side with the original UK press, there is no comparison. The vinyl remasters are compressed as well. There is great clarity yes, but at the expense of wide sound stage and full deep sound. I could only listen for a few minutes and I started getting irritated. This was a wasted opportunity to make definitive versions of these great recordings that could have pleased everybody.
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 17 Mar 2010 19:34:10
@ mistermuse: I do tend to agree. The vinyls are not as BADLY compressed as the CD/SACD, but still worse than the originals and worse than the DE (Definitive Edition) CDs from 1994.

@ Rob: Yeah, the delay was caused by my first player being defective and having to be sent back! My replacement arrived yesterday, hence my first rip now!
Gotta say, despite the bad source (in this case) my gear has done a nice ripping job! The rip sounds as good to my ears as the original. I'll be sharing more Genesis since this has proved incredibly popular.
Posted By: Dr. Robert Date: 17 Mar 2010 22:12:46
@ LD

We all look forward to more of your SACD rips to satisfy everyone's appetite for more high rez stuff. I know with your high standards and low tolerance for "remastered" crap we will be treated to only the best that modern digital formats are ALLOWED to provide.

@ everyone - Where is everyone's thanks, opinions and comments on this. This guy put in almost as much work in this rip as a vinyl ripper. (No de-clicking necessary, lucky bastard). Your comments are our only reward for sharing.
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 18 Mar 2010 00:49:57
@ Rob: Haha! Thanks for your kind comment - but it's ok - my reward is lots of RS points, which = more free months, which = lots more free stuff from other sharers like your good self! I always appreciate thanks or even constructive comments, it's nice to be part of the community, but the main reward is the RS points!

You're right, I have a very low tolerance for remastered crap - but unfortunately this IS remastered crap! I have been totally honest about it in my post though, as I knew many people will want to DL it anyway, and many won't agree that this sounds crap (compressed to fuck). Most SACDs sound crap to me. The Dylan Blonde On Blonde SACD sounds crap, compared to the Mastersound CD - because the majority of the sound quality we get is either won or lost at the mastering stage (assuming it's a good recording in the first place). If it's a loud, over-compressed, clipped master (like the Genesis ones) then it will still sound bad even on SACD. Happily there are some real audiophile SACDs out there too. Anyway, Trick Of The Tail next...
Posted By: SuperFuzz Date: 18 Mar 2010 01:40:40
Glad to see you sharing this, although I'm passing since this isn't my cup of tea. What I'm wondering is - what's the deal with RS points? I'm not a premium member or anything, never paid them a dime, but I have 17,500 "free rapid points" and 56,000 premium points. What can I get with those. I'm fine with being a non-paying member, when I download stuff from RS it maxes out my crappy internet connection anyway, so maybe it's not worth upgrading?
Posted By: musicalbox Date: 18 Mar 2010 09:14:45
@LezDawson: I almost downloaded it, such a temptation :D

but I already got the aksman's vinyls (I would like to have them re-ripped with his recent set-up, maybe next Christmas ;) thanks to Dr. Robert upload...and I think I got this Tony's melotron/synthetizer attack already, not the SACD layer though... (not their good album either)

one question though, shouldn't you "burn-in" your recent musical toy? I think you should leave it playing for day-two-tree non-stop (1 CD, volume down, doesn't matter) before any grabbing for DAC to open more...

any musical equipment needs some time, some as much as 800 hours, gosh
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 18 Mar 2010 19:44:22
@ musicalbox: Well, the burn-in time is probably most important for the audio cables, and they have been well burned in already on other equipment. I'm not sure that the player itself will improve at all by being burned in. Maybe I'm wrong - but it does sound excellent already. And I don't believe anything takes 800 hours to burn in. Much of that time is just your ears getting used to your new gear, so it sounds better (I read about this in the booklet I got with my B&W speakers). It's just psychological. 24-48 hours should be enough for anything.

@ SuperFuzz - I guess if your internet connection is too crappy to take advantage then there maybe is not much point to upgrading. But the main advantage is: no waiting for downloads to start, also up to 600kbps DL speeds (although, like you, that's more than my connection can do anyway), and I believe you can download up to 25GB in a single day - but once this 25GB quota has been used up, the account is just topped up again by about 5GB per day until the max is reached again. But you can convert free points into topping up more download allowance, or convert into more free months of having the account (10000 points = 1 month). I think 8000 premium points can be converted to 10000 free points. You can also convert premium points into rewards (like iPods, computer keyboards, T-shirts - whatever is on offer that month). Although strangely there don't appear to be any awards on offer at the moment, and I'm not sure why. Again, maybe someone else can enlighten us on that. But if you feel a premium account may be of use to you, then you will easily be able to fund it with just points, rather than cash. Mine is "paid up" for several months ahead, just from points I've made. You can buy a new premium account for (I think) 8000, or maybe 10000, free points. You may be able to transfer your accumulated points over to your new account too - but to be honest I'm not sure.
Posted By: johhenrik Date: 18 Mar 2010 21:05:25
DL speed is all you can eat. I easily download at 7-9MB/s when utilizing several parallel downloads from RS. You have a 5GB "allowance" per day, where you can bank up to 25GB. If you download between 2-10am CET (which I have jDownloader setup to do), your download only count as 1/10th, so you can download 50GB per day like that.

Premium awards are on hold now. Just click on the News link once in a while and you get all the details of what they are doing.

You can also use RS points to download, if you don't have any download allowance left. I'm not sure about the conversion rate there though.
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 18 Mar 2010 21:31:13
Thanks for the info johhenrik, I have now amended my figures above! ;)
And nice to be reminded of the 1/10th thing at night! Many of us do our really BIG DLs at night anyway, so that is really useful.
I did look at News but couldn't see anything about rewards - perhaps I need new glasses! I'll check again.
Posted By: drasglaf Date: 19 Mar 2010 16:05:25
Will this rip sound better than the DER cd? Many thanks.
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 19 Mar 2010 22:01:12
@ drasglaf: depends! I posted this one first because it had the most to gain from a remix - the original recording and mix were pretty poor - this album never sounded sonically good, even though the songs are fantastic - the main problem is the very poorly recorded and mixed vocals. I personally still prefer the DER, but this new mix reveals much more detail that was lost on the original mix - especially with the vocals. But this is just so goddam compressed!!! It really clips and distorts on the louder parts. I'd recommend to hear both - you'll get something out of both of them. But yeah, the DER wins hands down for me.
Posted By: pirulo1984 Date: 22 Mar 2010 04:39:25
Genesis - Wind And Wuthering

A question: not surround sound is a remix?; on scans I only read surround remix, on other format say only remastered.

I never listened this album, but really sound recording is very poor.

Thanks anyway.

Posted By: LezDawson Date: 23 Mar 2010 16:04:58
@ pirylo1984: The stereo version is a remix - just listen to it, listen to the different sounds and reverbs and new balance. Obviously its a remix, you can't change something that much just by remastering! ;)
The stereo remix was sub-mixed from the 5.1 mix.
Posted By: elmajico Date: 24 Jun 2010 15:54:03
thanks mate!!!!
Posted By: aaf Date: 12 Sep 2010 22:41:57
I dont know whats wrong with the cue files, but I just got 5 seconds of track 1... hiks...

* I use medieval cue splitter
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 13 Sep 2010 19:17:13
@ aaf:
Nothing is wrong with the cue. Medieval cue splitter is utter crap, you're not advised to use it. ;) It causes samples to be lost because the cuts are so inaccurate. There is loads of info on the net about that appalling software. CUETools is MUCH much better - perfectly accurate, works with all lossless formats - and is free.
However, this is a 24-bit file, so I recommend using Foobar2000 to split it, as CueTools won't work for 24-bit files. :)
Posted By: znkp Date: 22 Oct 2010 23:27:24
Can you give me a link where I can learn how to use Foobar to split files. please? It seems, I am missing something, Thanks.
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 23 Oct 2010 14:24:49
Open the cue file with Foobar. Then highlight all tracks, right-click, and select "convert." You can then select to convert to individual tracks.
If you want to burn it to CD, you must convert to 16-bit tracks - make sure dither is ON if converting to 16-bit, or OFF if keeping 24 bit.
If burning to DVD-A, you don't need to split the tracks. Just use DVD-Audio Solo (or similar) which works with the cue + image file.
If you just want to play it on your PC there is no need to split it.
Posted By: znkp Date: 26 Oct 2010 00:05:26
Thanks for the tip. However, I already knew it. My problem was that I did not have flac.exe installed. I am doing it now. Let's see how it goes. Thanks.
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 27 Oct 2010 19:53:35
You already knew it. OK. Any time you want to ask me something you already know, please don't hesitate, and then I'll spend time telling you something you already knew.
Recent searches: