Loading...
Done
Home > Video

The Cloud Mystery: The Real Driver Of Climate Change (2007)

Posted By : LezDawson | Date : 28 Dec 2009 14:20:01 | Comments : 10 |
|



The Cloud Mystery: The Real Driver Of Climate Change (2007)
MP4 | 720 x 400 (16:9) | 128 kbps MP3 | English | 0hr 52min | 797 MB
Subtitles: English soft subs for Swedish introduction (2 mins 30 sec)
Science Documentary


THE CLOUD MYSTERY is a scientific detective story. It tells how a Danish scientist, Henrik Svensmark, through pioneering experiments in Copenhagen, solved the puzzle of how supernova explosions in our Galaxy and variations in the Sun govern climate changes on the Earth.

Scarcely audible above the noise about global warming, Svensmark has reported a new kind of aerial chemistry triggered by events in our Galaxy that shower our planet with atomic particles – the cosmic rays. This celestial mechanism determines cloudiness and temperatures on Earth. It is so powerful that we now have to re-evaluate the causes of global warming.


STEPS IN THE STORY
Strong evidence that changes in the Earth's climate follow changes in the Sun's magnetic behaviour came from the Copenhagen scientists Eigil Friis-Christensen and Knud Lassen in 1991. In principle it might explain most of the warming in the 20th Century, but no one knew how the Sun could affect the climate so much.

One effect of solar changes is to vary the number of cosmic rays reaching the Earth from the Galaxy. In 1995 Henrik Svensmark, also in Copenhagen, began to wonder if the cosmic rays could affect cloud cover. When he compared satellite observations of clouds with the varying counts of cosmic rays from year to year, he found an amazing link. A stronger Sun and fewer cosmic rays meant fewer clouds and a warmer world. Friis-Christensen agreed with this explanation for the Sun's role.


Scientists favouring carbon dioxide as the driver of global warming rejected the discovery. Yet ample evidence reveals Sun-driven climate change, long before human industry could have been a factor. The astronomer Nir Shaviv of Jerusalem takes the viewer to cliffs by the Dead Sea, where layers of sediment show alternations of wet and dry periods over centuries and millennia. The changes matched solar-driven variations in the intensity of cosmic rays.


Continuing his investigations, with Nigel Marsh, Svensmark found that the clouds most affected by variations in the cosmic rays are those at low altitude. Although surprising, this fitted very well with the emerging theory of cloud-driven climate change. The next question was, How could the cosmic rays affect cloud formation? As explained in the film by Richard Turco from Los Angeles, water vapour condenses to make cloud droplets only in the presence of invisible particles floating in the air as aerosols, or cloud condensation nuclei. Cosmic rays might help to make the aerosols.

Svensmark wanted to carry out a laboratory experiment on that possible influence of cosmic rays on cloud condensation nuclei. But he ran into strong opposition to the very idea of an experiment, from scientists who dismissed the possibility of any connection. As a result, Svensmark and his team were short of funds. The work of building an experimental chamber in the basement of the Danish National Space Center was painfully slow.


Meanwhile, in 2002, unexpected support came from Nir Shaviv in Jerusalem, who carried the story of cosmic rays and climate back over hundreds of millions of years, from an astronomer's point of view. Shaviv realised that whenever the Sun and its planets visit the bright spiral arms of the Milky Way Galaxy, they are exposed to stronger cosmic rays, which create 'icehouse' conditions on the Earth. Visiting MØns Klint in Denmark, Shaviv points out the chalk cliffs dating from the 'hothouse' world of the dinosaurs, and the bulldozing action of glaciers in the present 'icehouse' era. His interpretations turned out to fit beautifully with the discovery of alternations of warm and cool oceans, by the geologist Ján Veizer of Toronto.

By 2005, the experiment in Copenhagen was at last running well. It gave very clear evidence for the role of cosmic rays in helping to build small aerosols that grow into cloud condensation nuclei. But the next problem was to get the report published in a scientific journal. Svensmark and his team faced rejection after rejection, for no very good reason. As the eminent physicist Eugene Parker comments in the film, politically incorrect ideas about global warming face this kind of resistance in the scientific community.

At long last, the paper was accepted for publication by the Royal Society of London in 2006. While the champagne flowed, Svensmark said the cloud mystery was solved but wondered when the climate community would catch up with his discovery. The film ends with Shaviv pointing out that we are part of a galactic ecosystem, and Svensmark saying we must no longer think of the Earth as an island in space.


Conclusion:
Svensmark built the world’s largest cloud chamber at the Danish National Space Centre(Now DTU Space) in Copenhagen. They worked five years in the laboratory before they had the results. During the fall of 2006 the epoch making results were publishing world-wide in science literature. The results concluded that the climate of Earth is decisively influenced by exploding stars and additionally: This mechanism literally turns the Earth’s thermostat upside down. This means that Cosmic rays produces aerosols in our atmosphere, which are necessary for the formation of clouds. Without these aerosols water vapour cannot condense into droplets and form clouds. Remember that water vapour is by far the dominating greenhouse gas, and even very small changes in the global cloud cover will change the Earth radiation budget significantly.
Natural events in our Galaxy and on the manic-depressive Sun decide whether the Earth’s cloud cover is letting the Sun heat or cool the surface of the Earth. The clouds, obedient to the cosmic rays, are the dominant driver of climate change. As a result we have to re-evaluate our understanding of the climate. A new field in climate research called cosmoclimatology is progressing.


Past climate variations
Using this discovery we are now able to explain how the feeble Sun allowed more clouds to form and cool the world 300 years ago during the Little Ice Age. During the 20th Century the Sun doubled its magnetic strength and warmed the Earth. And just recently Henrik Svensmark together with astronomers and geologists have documented an extraordinary relationship between these celestial events and the evolution of biosphere's millions of years back in time.

The discovery introduces a new fascinating perspective that we are indeed taking part in a intergalactic eco system where the evolution of biosphere's are linked to celestial forces through climate change on all time scales.

Extra Information
The IPCC has rejected Henrik Svensmark's findings, claiming that there is poor correlation between solar activity and global surface temperature measurements in recent decades. This is reported on Wikipedia and on the BBC website.

However, Henrik Svensmark has refuted this assertion on the basis that solar activity continues to correlate near-perfectly with both ocean sub-surface temperature readings and satellite-troposphere temperature readings. The only reasonable conclusion from these findings is that the global surface temperature record is not accurate. Literally in the last 2 months this has been backed up by the Climategate findings, which revealed that data manipulation and 'fudging of data' did indeed take place within the IPCC.
The BBC has not updated it's web page on this issue.


ADVERTISING » High Speed Download « ADVERTISING




Posted By: sunsetstrip Date: 28 Dec 2009 14:47:04
Will this bullshit never end?

> Literally in the last 2 months this has been backed up by the Climategate findings, which revealed that data manipulation and 'fudging of data' did indeed take place within the IPCC.

Just because some scientists are believed to have tampered with data years ago, it doesn't mean all the following calculations by all other institutes are wrong. Look at Bolivia already facing completely disappeared glaciers. Look at who is financing this bullshitters. Look at their reputation.

Look at the actual coreelation between sunspots and temperature: [link: http://www.climate4you.com/Sun.htm#Global%20temperature%20and%20sunspot%20number]site even linked from svensmark's site[/link]
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 28 Dec 2009 15:11:38
"Just because some scientists are believed to have tampered with data years ago"

Now now, you're not being honest, and you know it! Firstly, it is not 'belief' - they *admit* to tampering with data in the emails - they welded 2 different datasets together in the same graph without explaining that's what they'd done, in order to hide the decline and the MWP (amongst many other things, that most people are aware of by now). And it wasn't just 'years ago' - these emails contain evidence of corruption up to November 2009. Sorry to burst your bubble.

"Look at Bolivia already facing completely disappeared glaciers"

Yeah - and...? So what? Glaciers come, glaciers go. Nothing stays static, baby. Climate changes (always has), and this manifests itself in many ways. But that has nothing to do with identifying the *cause*.

As for your link - did you bother to look at who supplied the data? Yep. It's our old corrupt friends, the crooks at the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research and the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU), UK.

I think I'll take their data with a large bucket of salt. You can continue to follow the Prophet of Climate Doom, Al Gore and believe the science is 'settled' and the 'debate is over' (which Al Gore has been saying since 1992!) and continue to believe in your discredited hockey stick.

I'll remain sceptical for now.
Posted By: Nokios Date: 28 Dec 2009 16:56:54
Westerners have now a new religion_or should-I say superstition_which is "Global warming results from human activity" and tend to believe the most stupid erroneous catastrophic scenarios preached by some bankrupt failed politicians (Al Gore the sore etc..)trying to find a role after being rejected

I do not know about this new theory but I think that it is too arrogant that man think he can change the planet's weather on such a scale...Remember all humanity on this planet is less than one small microbe on a foot ball..
Fluctuation has always been here since eternity ...and to my knowledge it is not human activity that changed the weather causing the disappearance of the dinosaurs !

A little humility is the least courtesy we can ask these pseudo-scientist charlatans to have !

A few years ago (in the seventies)these same voices were crying claiming the planet was getting colder

Behind these arrogant scientists all the parasites (the anti-globalists,the failed anarchists,the self claimed anti-racist and leftist movements) have found a scare to get both attention and money !
Posted By: peterpansen23 Date: 28 Dec 2009 17:26:46
he parasites (the anti-globalists,the failed anarchists,the self claimed anti-racist and leftist movements)

you forgot the jews... mr nazi
Posted By: Nokios Date: 28 Dec 2009 17:41:39
peterpansen23

You have a really strange attitude..you are using STALINISTIC and NAZI techniques to attack my point of view..

Are you a former member of the politbureau or were you just a small informer?

Did I offend your feelings when I wrote my opinion against anarchists ?

Know that you are just accusing me of something I did not say and I hate ...

Hitler,Mussolini,Stalin,Beria,Mao,Polpot,FARC terrorists...,these criminals were all "Socialists" and "Nazional SOCIALIST" =NAZI ...and the anti globalization the "Black Block" are excited violent anarchists which is just worse !

Read carefully:
I am against all terrorists including anti-Jewish organizations like the shitty Hezbolla and the fanatical Hamas my friend !
Posted By: Lilywhite Lilith Date: 28 Dec 2009 18:44:13
Great post. This is about science, in the face of hysteria. I can't believe how STUPID some people are that actually believe politicians when they tell them they need to take more centralised power so they can "save the f@cking planet"!!!!!! If it weren't so serious it would be f@cking hilarious! And all these stupid bleeding hearts are going "Yes Obama! Yes Gordon! Yes Al! Take my money, take my rights! Form an unelected, centralised, dictatorial, accountable-to-no-one world government! And lets save the planet!" "And I know the Climategate emails show what a bunch of fraudulent crooks you can be - but hell, I trust you, I trust your data, I trust your graphs, I trust your projections, and I hate those nasty denialists!" Hahaha! Useful idiots!
Keep up the great posts LD.
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 28 Dec 2009 19:05:20
More here folks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIAQ3drhXbE&feature=related
Posted By: fluorospace Date: 29 Dec 2009 09:33:36
It doesn't even matter if global warming is real or not, western countries consume too much of the resources of the planet and they should slow down and give others a chance.
Posted By: sunsetstrip Date: 29 Dec 2009 11:45:01
1) As with most people suffering from american paranoia syndrome (communism, centralism, mind control, the UN, whatever your hobby) it's hard to discuss, as they're always only picking the weakest point of a set of arguments, taking it for the whole picture. great rhetoric, but not much more. stuff like this is coming from the same people, that accept it to live in states where abortion, oral intercourse, alcohol or even drying your undies outside is criminalized, where corporate media is completely politically biased, where the political system depends on big money's 'donations', to only be able to finance a political campaign. Freedom? Sounds like the freedom to ignore a stop sign. Have they ever taken a peek outside of the american cultural bubble? Probably not even been to Canada.

2) There is no way to brainwash the complete international scientific community, especially it's chinese, russian and arabic members. Oops, forgot about the fluoride ;)

3) It's so easy to understand: fossil carbon is bound energy. Release it and it will have its impact. Thermodynamics (no energy is lost) + greenhouse gases (creating a better and better isolation from space). The rest is details.

4) @Nokios. Then stop using Nazi rhetoric yourselves, like comparing people to insects, rats or other parasites.

5) And while you're on youtube watching more bull, do a search on the "CO2 is green" campaign. Laugh your head off. Then have a look who finances its publishers. Look who's connected to them, too.
Posted By: LezDawson Date: 29 Dec 2009 17:59:09
@ fluorospace: Oh give it up already! It's political corruption that holds back other countries, not us consuming resources. "Slow down" my ass. When did YOU ever slow down? Do you own a computer and monitor? How about giving up that technology in the interest of 'slowing down'. And ask yourself: by slowing down and consuming less, who do you think you are helping? There is no shortage of resources now. Oil ain't gonna run out for centuries. Who knows how much more untapped oil to be discovered? There's plenty to go round, but when it starts to run out, we will have to - by necessity - start looking at developing alternative technology - that's if we don't already have great alternatives by then!
But until then, please stop your hysterical nonsense. And how about telling the communist tyrants who rule those backward countries to give their people 'a chance'?
Recent searches: